President Xi’s tone regarding Taiwan itself was unchanged from recent communications. It was not suggestive of any imminent invasion, which is unlikely before China has secured semiconductor supply chains. Xi reiterated China’s preference for resolving the issue peacefully but again did not renounce the use of force.
The Party Congress concluded on October 23rd with President Xi announcing the new seven-man Politburo Standing Committee and leading them on stage in rank order. There were two notable omissions from the previous selection in 2017. Li Keqiang, the premier of China was not included in the Standing Committee. He is seen as being outside Xi’s inner circle and was pushed into retiring in March 2023, before reaching the retirement age of 68. Wang Yang, a previous vice premier of China, who, like Li Keqiang, was not seen as a loyalist to Xi, was also demoted. Li Qiang, party secretary of Shanghai, is a close ally of Xi and was second on stage, implying he is in line to become premier in March next year.
Notably, there were no obvious successors to Xi in the Standing Committee line-up. A designated successor is usually young enough to serve one term in waiting and two terms as leader before the retirement age of 68. This indicates that Xi may intend to remain Chinese President for at least another 10 years, despite being 69 himself.
Markets reacted negatively to the Party Congress. MSCI China (USD) fell by 10.3% from the close of the Congress until the end of October. Over the same period, MSCI Asia Pac ex Japan (USD) returned -1.4%. Taking a longer-term view, MSCI China (USD) outperformed the MSCI ACWI (USD) by 280.4% in the 10 years prior to Xi’s initial election in 2012 (see Chart 4). This period was also associated with rapid growth of the Chinese economy, with annual GDP growth averaging 10.7% per year during that time. In the following 10 years under Xi’s leadership, MSCI China (USD) underperformed MSCI ACWI (USD) by 110.9%. It is important to note that much of this underperformance came in 2021, with MSCI China (USD) down 40.7% relative to MSCI ACWI (USD), and can be linked to China’s zero-Covid policy and struggling real estate sector. This situation could change rapidly if there were positive developments in these factors.